Click Here to Return to Home Page
Phantom Leg Pain Email c. 1997 from Bobby Matherne to Doyle Henderson
Edited to use in doyletics.com August 15, 2000
So guess who gets my first E-mail from my new Pentium 166 system? You! It's been kind of a pain in the rear to get it working on-line, which brings me to the next subject.
I've had diarrhea due to stomach virus for a couple of days and although it's gone, I had a little rectal itching that usually accompanies the diarrhea for me, up until now. This morning I applied A&D ointment, which prompted Del to say, "Why not do a doyle trace? The A&D is what I did with my boys in those times."
So I did. At about 2 years old the worst part of the itching was gone, so I ended the trace. I was left with only a barely noticeable irritation which, within a hour, completely disappeared. As I saw it, the slight irritation was the stimulus that triggered the more irritating doylic itching that I found so annoying. No big deal, but certainly an improvement, and one that will be permanent, since the itching doyles are gone for good, which is a big deal.
I drove to Walgreen's to pick up a perscription for my wife before she left for NJ with her mom. On the way back I was thinking how ALL the itching was gone and how marvelous your theory was. That's when I got to thinking of the similarity of my itching with phantom leg pain.
That's when the brainstorm hit me!! Certainly phantom leg pains are doyles; I think we've discussed it and traded stories. The phantom pain is real pain triggered by a memory that activates the sensory cortex. Just found someone who's confirmed that memories can activate the sensory cortex. [See: http://www.hhmi.org/news/buckner.html for details on the work of Buckner etal]
Here's the big deal about my insight:
IF YOU HAVE PHANTOM LEG PAIN,
AND YOU HAVE A LEG, YOU CALL IT REAL PAIN ! ! !
UP UNTIL NOW, UP UNTIL DOYLETICS!
If I didn't have a butt, I would have called it "phantom butt pain," but I did have one, so I called it real pain. So, my very smart friend and cyber-neighbor, you have shown the world that feelings are phantom pains! Painful emotions are phantom pains! All emotions are of the same structure as phantom pains. A phantom pain is a 3-D reconstructed pain created over the actual body [like a phantom] so that it has the semblance, the actuality, of a REAL PAIN. Likewise all emotions have the same structure. If my wife experiences a painful emotion, she feels as a constriction in her chest. Since she has a chest, she calls it a real pain in her chest.
Anyhow, the phantom leg pain gives us a whole new tack for explaining to the public about Doyletics.
Remember my basic tenet, heck, I don't even have a name for it, up until now: "If one person has done something, we all can do it, and are doing it all the time, out of our awareness." [Matherne's Pervasion of Process Principle, that's a possible name]
Applying the MPPP to phantom leg pain: if an amputee can experience phantom pain in a limb that's not there, a non-amputee can experience phantom pain in a limb that IS there. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but doesn't this highlight the importance of Doyletics in a totally new way?